![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
Crain's “Companies should consider coverage
Small Business In a perfect world, employers could predict "bad whether" and stave off the storm of employee lawsuit crossing the country. However, today even the most proactive measures might not keep the rain away. The cost of settling a claim of discrimination, litigating a harassment case through trial, or paying a wrongful discharge judgment can rock a company right to its core. Employment-related claims and monetary damages resulting from such claims have increased significantly. Since the 1980s, employment discrimination cases have increased by 2,000% in the federal court alone. In 2003, employees filed more than 81,000 charges of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, resulting in awards in excess of $236 million. Many factors have contributed to the increase in employment-related claims. The Family and Medical Leave act, the Americans with Disability Act, amendments to the title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other new legislation have broadened potential employer liability exponentially. Employers have turned to employment practices liability insurance to protect their assets in the face of potentially devastating employment litigation. Employment practices liability insurance typically provides coverage for a multitude of employment-related administrative charges and lawsuits, including those involving work place harassment, discrimination and wrongful discharge. Policies also might provide coverage for lawsuits involving emotional distress, negligent supervision and other nonstatutory claims. In 1991, only five companies offered employment practices liability insurance coverage. These days, employers can choose from more than 60 companies offering this insurance. All this variety can provide a boon to lawyers, but it also should raise some important considerations. Like any other type of insurance, employers should make sure the policy they select meets their needs at a competitive price. Employers should also understand that by purchasing the insurance, they become "partners" with their insurance companies in deciding how to tackle claims. In addition, different policies apply deductibles and coverage limits on different bases. For example, some policies include per-claimant deductible limits instead of covering all claimants involved in a matter under one deductible. Finally, some policies include a "hammer clause" that allows the insurance company to decrease or cut off coverage if the employer refuses to settle a claim per the insurer's request. Here are other tips to consider:
Stephen S. Zashin, an attorney with Zashin & Rich Co. LPA, is an Ohio State Bar Association Certified Specialist in Labor and Employment Law. Reach him at 216-696-4441 or ssz@zrlaw.com . |
||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer ©Copyright 2008 Zashin & Rich Co., L.P.A. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||